At Sigao Studios, we are passionate about making scrum perform well for clients.

In our scrum implementations, we recognize that culture and process work together.  Attempting to put scrum process in place without considering the organizational culture can cause poor performing scrum implementations.

One of the core philosophies of scrum is self-directed teams.  This is one of several attributes of scrum which may conflict with organizational culture, particularly one based in principles of ‘traditional’ management.  Such conflicts can derail a scrum implementation or severely inhibit its productivity; in this post, I’ll talk about three.

Self-directed teams can expose a permission-based organization.

In traditional management thought, the manager gives subordinates permission, either implicitly or explicitly, to perform their work.  Permission-based organizations have a culture in which the doers feel that they must have explicit or clearly implied permission before they can take action.  This culture reveals itself in: emails CCed to the leader in which intent is expressed, often vaguely, to do something; permission-seeking interruptions – “Hey, just wanted you to know that I’m about to…”; FYI communications prior to action, rather than direct reports of what has been accomplished.  These activities are all veiled attempts by the doers to get a leader to tell them what to do, or at least for the manager to stop the doers from taking a misstep.  In short, given the authority to make decisions, doers often reject it through seeking permission.  This weakness can be countered by training in a mature delegation model.

Self-directed teams can also expose a lack of sound self-management principles throughout the organization.

In traditional management thought, the manager tells the subordinates what to do.  Traditionally-minded managers and doers understand and expect this.  Therefore, no one in the organization, including the individual doers, expects doers to have a robust model of self-management.  This culture reveals itself in dropped commitments, scattered efforts in many directions, and poor productivity.  In short, given the authority to self-determine their work, doers have not been trained to do so.  (Sadly, many managers also do not have robust self-management models.)  This weakness can be countered by organization-wide training in mature self-management models.

Finally, self-directed teams can expose a lack of candor in communications.

In traditional management thought, the manager is to be accorded a different level of respect than peers.  The manager has more power, knowledge, and authority than subordinates.  Therefore, bad news and negative feedback can only flow in one direction, from the manager to the subordinate.  This culture reveals itself in a lack of candid communication in regard to both style and content.  Add to this the general reluctance that people have toward candor and communication grinds to a halt as doers carefully craft communication to leaders and strenuously avoid reporting bad news.  In short, put in a position of greater knowledge about progress and problems, doers struggle to communicate their knowledge to the organization.  This weakness can be countered by organization-wide training in candid communication methods.

As a core philosophy of scrum, self-directed teams require an organizational and leadership culture with strong delegation models, strong self-management models, and candid communication methods.  Sigao staff have developed such models and coaching processes around them.  Sigao coaching personnel lead client managers and staff to see these aspects of their firm’s culture and effectively address them.

You have the training.
Now you need the job.

Unlock your potential with our new course: ‘How to Build an Agile Resume’. Dive into impactful lessons, gain exclusive insights, and join our Launch Party!


Leave a Comment

Related Posts

Responding to Change over Following a Plan

Explore the Agile value of Responding to Change over Following a Plan, and learn how to adapt quickly in a
April 18, 2024
Chris Sims

Working Product over Comprehensive Documentation

Prioritize working product over comprehensive documentation to create solutions that solve real human problems.
April 11, 2024
Corey Stewart
Tombstone with Agile written on the stone

Agile is Dead

Oh, the melodramatic eulogies for Agile, with Scrum Masters laid off and Product Owners disappearing into the sunset! “Agile is

April 5, 2024
The Agile Curmudgeon

Customer Collaboration over Contract Negotiation

When businesses and clients get too caught up in contract details, they lose focus on what’s important in real-world projects

April 4, 2024
Chris Sims

CAVU’s Sprint Planning Toolkit

Today, I’ll walk you through how to leverage our free Sprint Planning Toolkit to optimize your team’s performance and ensure
April 3, 2024
Chris Sims

5 Ways to Encourage Your Team

Unlock team potential with practical Agile methods for Scrum Masters to motivate and support their teams towards success. #AgileGrowth”
March 13, 2024
Chris Sims

Elevate Your Agility

Subscribe to our Blogs
Select the coaching guidance you would like in your inbox.
Scroll to Top