Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

In studying communication and candor, I’ve come across the notion of “strong opinions, loosely held” as a foundation for candor.

Lately, I’ve heard this concept expressed in a different and, to my mind, better way. In this post, I’ll explain why the concept is important to a healthy organizational culture. Then I’ll explain why I think the new formulation is better.

Ideas in organizational culture

We all agree that a strong organizational culture includes the ability of any person to express their ideas. We want an idea meritocracy – the best idea gets adopted and the organization improves. The problem is that having different ideas usually involves conflict as people propose and defend their perspectives. Most organizations and teams are allergic to this kind of debate. But it is important for several reasons:

  1. We think of conflict as a bad thing – We rush toward unity or consensus by swallowing our opinions.
  2. If we squash open debate, we open ourselves to groupthink –  The lack of different or opposing ideas can hide the weaknesses of a given approach. We wind up achieving a form of “consensus” which is really a rubber-stamping of ideas we don’t agree with.
  3. People need to be able to say what they see, regardless of their position in the organization – This flies in the face of traditional ideas about how we talk to and in front of our boss. “Never bring the boss bad news.” “Don’t be negative/don’t whine.” “Don’t ‘show up’ a peer in front of the boss.” “Don’t bring me problems, bring me solutions.” Even in brainstorming exercises, we’re taught (incorrectly, it turns out – look for another post) that ideas shouldn’t be criticized as that causes people to not speak up.

If we’re going to have healthy debate and candor within our teams, how should we behave? Even if the culture supports debate, it is difficult to express different ideas in helpful ways – in ways that don’t lead to anger and bad feelings. It is also difficult to avoid the HIPPO (highest paid person’s opinion) or the loudest voice carrying the day despite weaknesses in their ideas.

Finally, we are often not discussing black/white questions – many decisions involve finding the best of several imperfect possible solutions.

Struggling with the old adage

Several thoughtful people have advanced the idea I mention above, “strong opinions, loosely held”, as a way to think about how to communicate in debate settings.

The notion, as I understand it, is to argue strongly for your position, but be willing to abandon that position as soon as it is shown to be wrong. After understanding this approach, I’ve tried to adopt it and have struggled.

Reasons:

  1. I don’t usually advance an idea in a way that it can be proven wrong –  I’m not alone in this because it’s really hard to do.
  2. I don’t know when to move from the “strong opinion” phase to the “loosely held” phase – I’m reasonably thoughtful and have several years of experience in business. If an idea has obvious flaws, I self-censor (rightly or wrongly).
  3. How can I “loosely hold” an idea? – I either believe something to be true or not. And I have been trained to express my ideas with a confidence that borders on vehemence, in order to have the best chance of others agreeing. However, I have recently read “Thinking in Bets” by Annie Duke – she proposes that we view and state our opinions as probabilities (“I think X, but I’m only 60% confident”) to combat this.

A new formulation

Recently, I came across a different formulation that fits better in my head. In “Originals”, Adam Grant mentions the phrase “argue like you’re right and listen like you’re wrong”.

I’ve adopted it recently (and am still practicing) and I think I understand this approach better. I envision putting on a role as champion when I’m expressing my idea. But, I’ve got to remember to take on another role when someone else is speaking. The other role is that of a disinterested observer or even a critic of my own idea. I’m still practicing switching roles in this way, but the idea seems promising.

These are not the only ideas presented in Originals and Thinking in Bets, of course.

Both books are quite strong with lots of ideas about creativity and decision making. Highly recommended.

You have the training.
Now you need the job.

Unlock your potential with our new course: ‘How to Build an Agile Resume’. Dive into impactful lessons, gain exclusive insights, and join our Launch Party!

Comments

Leave a Comment

Related Posts

Working Software is the Measure of Progress

As we continue our series on The Twelve Principles Behind the Agile Manifesto, let’s examine “Working Software is the Measure

June 13, 2024
Corey Stewart

The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face-to-face conversation

Explore the benefits of face-to-face communication in Agile teams and learn strategies to overcome common barriers.
June 6, 2024
Chris Sims
PO and Dev working together

Agile Principle 4: Daily Collaboration Reduces Decision Latency

Discover how daily collaboration between business people and developers drives Agile success. Learn strategies to overcome cultural barriers, improve communication,
May 23, 2024
McCaul Baggett
Welcome Changing Requirements even late in the game.

We Welcome Changing Requirements

Explore how welcoming changing requirements in Agile development provides a competitive advantage by adapting quickly to customer needs and market
May 9, 2024
Chris Sims

Individuals and Interactions

The Agile mindset has transcended its roots in software development to become a vital component in many ways of working

May 8, 2024
McCaul Baggett
Emotional Intelligence

Emotional Intelligence in Agile Leadership

Emotional Intelligence (EI) has become a crucial skill in Agile leadership, enhancing team dynamics and adaptability in our rapidly changing
May 7, 2024
Matthew Rodriguez

Elevate Your Agility

Join our free weekly coaching tips
Unlock your potential with free, bite-sized Agile training and coaching delivered straight to your inbox. Learn from leaders with practical experience in Agility.
Scroll to Top